FHSS | Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences
← Back to Volume 6, Issue 10

Trade Partner Diversification and Changes in Asymmetric Trade Dependence

Zhanming Hu
Vol. 6, No. 10, pp. 174-181, 2026 DOI: 10.54691/kbr7ns25 October 19, 2026
Download PDF
Abstract.Trade partner diversification is often treated as evidence that economic dependence has declined. In global supply chains, however, a change in direct suppliers may leave important parts of the original relationship intact. Hirschman's analysis of foreign trade and national power explains why limited alternatives can place one country in a weaker position when a trade relationship is disrupted, while Farrell and Newman's network approach helps explain why dependence can remain in important upstream positions even after bilateral trade changes. Japan's rare-earth diversification after 2010 illustrates both problems. Japan expanded its sources through overseas projects, long-term supply agreements, recycling, technologies that reduced rare-earth use, and especially the Australia-Malaysia supply chain developed around Lynas. These measures gave Japanese firms more ways to respond to disruption, although their effects differed across projects and stages of production. China remained much harder to replace in refining, heavy rare earths, and permanent-magnet production. The Japanese experience shows that diversification reduces asymmetric dependence most clearly when new relationships create enough production capacity to replace the parts of the original supply chain that had been difficult to replace.
Keywords. Asymmetric trade dependence; trade partner diversification; supply-chain diversification; rare earths; Japan.
APA Citation Zhanming Hu (2026). Trade Partner Diversification and Changes in Asymmetric Trade Dependence. Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(10), 174-181. https://doi.org/10.54691/kbr7ns25

References

  1. Farrell, H., & Newman, A. L. (2019). Weaponized interdependence: How global economic networks shape state coercion. International Security, 44(1), 42–79. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00351
  2. Hirschman, A. O. (1945). National power and the structure of foreign trade. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520378179
  3. International Energy Agency. (2026). Rare earth elements. https://www.iea.org/reports/rare earth elements
  4. Japan External Trade Organization. (2012, August 9). 2012 JETRO global trade and investment report.https://www.jetro.go.jp/ext_images/en/reports/white_paper/trade_invest_2012_overview.pdf
  5. Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation, & Sojitz Corporation. (2011, March 30). Sojitz and JOGMEC enter into definitive agreements with Lynas including availability agreement to secure supply of rare earths products to Japanese market. Japan Organization for Metals and Energy Security. https://www.jogmec.go.jp/english/news/release/release_00373.html
  6. Japan Organization for Metals and Energy Security, & Sojitz Corporation. (2023, March 7). Securing supply of heavy rare earths to Japan with additional investment to Lynas. Japan Organization for Metals and Energy Security. https://www.jogmec.go.jp/english/news/release/release_00228.html
  7. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. (2025). White paper on international economy and trade 2025. https://www.meti.go.jp/english/report/data/wp2025/wp2025.html